The conflict is the confrontation between two or more customary complete reasons in the stage of fabrication and composition in such a way that one reason is right and the other reason is false. One reason has a criterion and the other has a criterion of intention. The conflict of evidences, especially the traditions, in the field of deriving Shariah rulings is not a new phenomenon, but it has appeared since the beginning of the spread of hadith and its application in the field of theology and jurisprudence. Their fundamental works show the background of the conflict discussion and its importance among them, who throughout history have spent a significant part of their scientific and research activities to resolve the conflict and provide disciplined solutions to resolve the conflict. In this article, which was carried out with a descriptive-analytical method based on library and documentary information and using sources and principles, an attempt was made to present a new division of these solutions to some examples that have been given less attention. take
The way out of the conflict is the combination of arguments and the proposal of one of them, if there is a preference, or referring to the first rule, which is related to the primary conflict, and the second is considered to be the solution of the established conflict. The explanation is that in the process of resolving the conflict, sometimes one of the two reasons is completely invalidated, which is called the argument that leads to the resolution of the conflict, and sometimes neither of the two reasons is invalidated, and in a way Issuance of both narrations is accepted, and because the evidence of the authenticity of the news refers to the issuance, not the implication of the result of applying this solution, it will be the sum of the two hadiths.