نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار حقوق خصوصی، گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
According to the right of preemption, if one of the two partners sells his share of immovable property, the other one can acquire it by paying the price paid by the buyer. However, if a condition is made for one or both of parties or the sale is canceled for another reason, there is a conflict between the right of preemption and the option of cancellation. Because, with the cancellation, the property of seller returns to the buyer, and this is against the right of the preemption which partner obtained from the buyer. Solutions have been proposed to resolve the conflict. However, most jurists have tried to reconciliation rights. So, the right of preemption is preferred over the buyer's termination option. Because, the customer's goal in canceling the sale is to achieve the price that will be paid to him by the intercessor. In addition, in cases where the purpose of the seller is not to return the matter, his right is secured. So, in case of option of condition and some other, the cancellation of contract takes precedence over the preemption. Since the appearance of Islamic evidence indicates priority of intercessor's right over other persons, rather than the partner. This article, with a practical purpose and using a qualitative (= descriptive-analytical) method, has tried to extract the appropriate rules to resolve the conflict between the right of cancellation and preemption from different opinions of Imamiyyah jurists and civil law writers of Iran.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)