نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 فقه و حقوق دانشکده الهیات دانشگاه قم، قم
2 فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
3 استادیار فقه و حقوق اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران
4 گروه حقوق دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه پیام نور تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the means of proving Hudud crimes is confession (Iqrar), and it is possible that in some cases, regarding the commission of a Hudud crime, two conflicting confessions may be presented, each with content that contradicts the other. Considering the retraction or non-retraction of one of the confessors from their confession, the possibility of raising these questions arises: If one or both confessors retract their confession, what is the jurisprudential ruling on the matter? Furthermore, assuming the existence of a probability or suspicion of collusion between the confessors, how can the ruling on the matter be analyzed? Also, in cases where the content of the presented confessions has a private right aspect, how can its private right aspect be secured? The conducted investigations indicate that, although the conflict of confessions in Hudud has not been discussed in Fiqh texts, by utilizing the primary rule of the chapter on conflict , the rule of ‘Dur’ (doubt), the rule of precaution in matters of blood (Ihtiyat fi al-Dima), the principle of innocence (Asl al-Bara’at), and the tenor of the discourse of great jurists (Fuqaha) in similar matters, the fall of conflicting confessions in both scenarios is justified, and in the absence of other probative evidence, the divine punishment (Hadd) is ruled to be dropped. Moreover, in order to prevent legal abuses and collusion by confessors to escape Hudud punishments, proportionate discretionary punishments can be foreseen. And if the Hudud crime has a private right aspect - such as theft (Sarqa) - because a person’s property is as respectable as their blood, and on the other hand, the confession of rational people against themselves is valid; it can be ruled that the right holder (Sahib al-Haqq) has the option to refer to one of the confessors and obtain their financial right .
کلیدواژهها [English]
)