نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشگاه دامغان، دامغان، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)
2 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشگاه دامغان، دامغان، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In addition to possible physical damage like removal of hymen, adultery causes loss of dignity and spiritual credibility of its victim. Different theories about some issues related to the civil liability of the perpetrator of adultery and victim compensation have caused conflicting judicial decisions. On establish or deny of Arsh al-Baqara in adultery with the consent of the parties, Overlapping or non-overlapping of Arsh al-Baqara and Mehr al-Mathl in rape, Conflict or non-conflict of civil responsibility with acquittal of rape,Requirement or non-requirement to submit a petition to demand Arsh al-Baqara and Mehr al-Mathl, Legitimacy or illegitimacy of receiving spiritual damages in addition to Arsh al-Baqara and Mehr al-Mathl precedent is confused. The purpose of this research is to prepare a clear and integrated judicial procedure with the descriptive-analytical method and criticism and comparison of jurisprudential fatwas and analysis of judicial decisions. Findings of the research show negation of Arsh al-Baqara in adultery with woman consent, non-overlapping of Arsh al-Baqara and Mehr al-Mathl in rape, non-conflict of civil liability with acquittal of rape, non-requirement to submit a petition to demand Arsh al-Baqara and Mehr al-Mathl, Legitimacy of receiving spiritual damages in addition to Arsh al-Baqara and Mehr al-Mathl.
کلیدواژهها [English]