فرایندهای ملی و بین‌المللی نوین ابعاد بشری حقوق محیط زیست

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق بین الملل، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)

2 دانشیار حقوق بین الملل، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

10.22075/feqh.2023.31713.3692

چکیده

دستیابی به قواعد جامع حقوق محیط زیست در زمینه خسارات زیست­ محیطی و به رسمیّت شناختن قواعد زیست ­محیطی لازم­ الرعایه با هدف ارتقای جایگاه محیط زیست و مهم­تر از آن جنبه ­های مؤثّر ارزش­ گذاری حقوق زیست­ محیطی بشری، از اهدافی است که در سایه مطالعه اسناد ملی و بین ­المللی و مشاهده خلأهای تقنینی و اجرایی و استخراج این شکاف ها دنبال شده است. به رسمیّت شناختن از منظر حقوقی با رعایت عناصر شکلی (دسترسی به اطّلاعات زیست­ محیطی، مشارکت عمومی در تصمیم­گیری ­های زیست محیطی و دسترسی به عدالت) و عناصر ماهوی (هوای پاک، آب و هوای ایمن، غذای تولید شده سالم و پایدار، دسترسی به آب سالم و بهداشتی کافی، محیط ­های زیستی، شغلی و سرگرمی غیرآلوده، زیستگاه سالم و تنوّع زیستی) از مسیرهای شناسایی حقوق بشر زیست­ محیطی هستند. تصویب قطعنامه­ ای که حقّ برخورداری از این حقوق را به رسمیّت بشناسد، رویکرد مثبتی برای تسریع تلاش ها در راستای تضمین بهره ­مندی از آنها خواهد بود. رویکردی که حقّ ­محور و تابع آن اقدامات فوری بوده در سایه تعامل کلیه دستگاه­ های تقنینی، اجرایی و قضایی ممکن است

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

New national and International Processes of Human Dimensions of Environmental Rights

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rasool Jarideh 1
  • Javad Salehi 2
1 PhD Student in International Law, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author)
2 Associate Professor in International Law, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Acquiring the rules of national and international environmental laws in the field of environmental damage and knowing the necessary environmental rules and interaction of the two with the aim of improving the status of the environment and most importantly, the effective aspects of valuing human environmental rights are some goals that have been pursued in the shadow of studying national and international documents and observing legislative and executive gaps and extracting these gaps. Recognition from a legal point of view by observing procedural elements (access to environmental information, public participation in environmental decision-making and access to justice), and the substantial elements (clean air, safe climate, healthy and sustainable food, access to sufficient safe and hygienic water, non-polluted work and entertainment environments, healthy habitat and biodiversity) is one of the ways to recognize environmental human rights. Passing a resolution that recognizes the right to enjoy these rights will be a positive approach to accelerate efforts to ensure their enjoyment. An approach that is right-oriented and subject to immediate measures that are possible in the shadow of the interaction of all legislative, executive and judicial powers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • environmental human rights
  • right to environment
  • right to information
  • public participation

مراجع

  • رضایی­ ناندلی، محبوبه (1392)، ظرفیّت ­های اجرایی حقوق عمومی ایران برای تحقق اصل مشارکت زیست محیطی، فصلنامه علوم محیطی، 3، 123-133.
  • عباسی سرمدی، مهدی؛ اسدی خمامی، رضا (1394)، مفهوم عدالت زیست محیطی و انعکاس آن در اسناد منطقه­ای و بین­المللی، راهبرد، 7733-57.
  • علیخانی، صادق؛ اسلامی، رضا؛ نیاورانی، صابر (1398)، ظرفیت­های قانون اساسی ایران در افزایش مشارکت شهروندان در پرتو راهبردهای حکمرانی خوب، تحقیقات حقوق خصوصی و کیفری، 40، 11-31.
  • امیدی، جلیل؛ یوسفی پور، فرهاد (1393)، موقعیت و مبانی ارزش گذاری محیط زیست و لزوم مقابله با آلاینده ها در فقه اسلام، مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی، 10، 30-7.
  • African Commission on Human and People's Rights (May 27 2002), Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR)/Nigeria, communication 155/96.
  • ALBUQUERQUE, CATARINA DE (THE UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR) (2014), Realising the Human Rights to Water and Sanitation: A Handbook, UN Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation.
  • Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2013), ASEAN Human Rights Declaration.
  • Averchenkova, Alina (January 2019), Legislating for a low carbon and climate resilient transition: learning from international experiences, Elcano Policy Paper, Madrid: Real Instituto Elcan.
  • Bachelet, Michelle (Mon 9 Sep 2019), Climate crisis is greatest ever threat to human rights, UN warns, The Guardian News Website of the year, https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/sep/09/climate-crisis-human-rights-un-michelle-bachelet-united-nations, Accessed on 2022/05/22.
  • BERG, HENK VAN DEN; JIGGINS, JANICE (April 2007), Investing in Farmers: the Impacts of Farmer Field Schools in Relation to Integrated Pest Management, World Development, 35, No. 4.
  • Chabarekh, Capricia; Afif, Charbel; Nagl, Christian; Mitri, George (2017), Lebanon’s National Strategy for Air Quality Management for 2030, European Union.
  • Climate Change Act of Republic of the Philippines (2009), REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9729.
  • Economic and Social Council (2019), Special edition: progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals, E/2019/68.
  • EMBER (March 2022), Global Electricity Review 2022.
  • ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ACT of Slovenia (ZVO-1) SOP-2004-01-1694, Act of 31 March 2004, No. 801-01/90-3/136.
  • Environmental Administrative Tribunal, http://environmentalrightsdatabase.org/environmental-administrative-tribunal/, accessed on 2022/05/22.
  • Environmental Information Act of Norway, Act of 9 May 2003, No.31.
  • EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF SOCIAL RIGHTS (December 6, 2006),Marangopoulos Foundation for Human Rights (MFHR) v. Greece, Complaint No. 30/2005.
  • EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (27.1.2009), TĂTAR v. ROMANIA, Application No. 67021/01.
  • Executive Decree No. 41578, 2019
  • French Law No 2017-1839 (30 December 2017), No. TREX1722331L.
  • Gould, Elise (2009), Childhood lead poisoning: conservative estimates of the social and economic benefits of lead hazard control, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 117, No. 7.
  • http://www.oki.antsz.hu
  • https://cpdp.debatpublic.fr/cpdp- courseulles/EN/DEBAT/DEBAT_PUBLIC.HTM.
  • https://di.unfccc.int/time_series, Accessed on 2022/05/22.
  • https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/long-term-strategies, Accessed on 2022/05/22.
  • https://www.gub.uy
  • https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/en/news/4236/opening-of-environmental-judge-certification-training-batch-x, Accessed on 2022/05/22.
  • https://www.sprep.org/inform/data-portals
  • https://www.vozdeamerica.com/a/peru-fiscalia-asesinato-ambientalistas-/5148352.html.
  • Human Rights Council (19 January 2017), Report of the Special Rapporteur on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment, A/HRC/34/49.
  • Human Rights Council (2019), Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, A/HRC/40/60/Add.2.
  • INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (NOVEMBER 15, 2017), THE ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN RIGHT, ADVISORY OPINION OC-23/17.
  • Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (2019), Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Brondízio, E. S., Settele, J., Díaz, S., Ngo, H. T. (eds). Bonn: IPBES secretariat.
  • International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2018), Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report 2018, A joint report of the custodian agencies, The World Bank.
  • Kabir, Ehsanul; Kim, Ki-Hyun; Szulejko, Jan E. (2017), Social Impacts of Solar Home Systems in Rural Areas: A Case Study in Bangladesh, Energies, No. 10.
  • MARX, Axel; WOUTERS, Jan; BRIGHT, Claire; (2019), Access to legal remedies for victims of corporate human rights abuses in third countries, European Parliament's Sub-Committee on Human Rights.
  • Montenegro Law on the Protection of Nature (2016)
  • Nachmany, Michal; Setzer, Joana (May 2018), Policy brief, Global trends in climate change legislation and litigation: 2018 snapshot, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Negotiating committee of the regional agreement (4 March 2018), REGIONAL AGREEMENT ON ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN (Escazú AGREEMENT), No. 56654; https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-18&chapter=27&clang=_en.
  • New Economics Foundation (2017), Grow Green: Sustainable Solutions for the Farm of the Future, The Vegan Society.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (September 2011), Environmental Taxation: A Guide for Policymakers.
  • Petroleum Operations (Maritime Zone Moratorium) Act, 2017
  • Pring, George (Rock); Pring, Catherine (Kitty) (2016), Environmental Courts & Tribunals: A Guide for Policy Makers, Global Environmental Outcomes LLC (GEO) and University of Denver Environmental Courts & Tribunals Study, Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
  • Quéré, Corinne Le; Korsbakken, Jan Ivar; Wilson, Charlie; Tosun, Jale; Andrew, Robbie; Andres, Robert J.; Canadell, Josep G.; Jordan, Andrew; Peters, Glen P.; Vuuren, Detlef P. van (25 Feb 2019), Drivers of declining CO2 emissions in 18 developed economies, Nature Climate Change, Vol. 9, No. 3.
  • Stoian, Dietmar; Rodas, Aldo; Butler, Megan; Monterroso, Iliana; Hodgdon, Benjamin (2018), Forest concessions in Petén, Guatemala: A systematic analysis of the socioeconomic performance of community enterprises in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
  • The Environmental Jurisprudence of Costa Rica’s Constitutional Court, http://environmentalrightsdatabase.org/the-environmental-jurisprudence-of-costa-ricas-constitutional-court/, accessed on 2022/05/22.
  • THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL (2006), The Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation, REGULATION (EC) No 1907/2006, Official Journal of the European Union, L 396/1, ANNEX XVII.
  • The European Parliament and of the Council (5 June 2019), Directive (EU) 2019/904 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (Text with EEA relevance).
  • The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2018), Future Policy Award Winners 2018
  • - Scaling Up Agroecology; https://www.fao.org/agroecology/slideshow/news-article/en/c/1187596/, accessed on 2022/05/24.
  • THE GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTE (2022), Accreditation status as of 27 April 2022.
  • The Global Environment Facility (Revised: Nov 5, 2013), Indigenous Peoples Advisory Group, TERMS OF REFERENCE.
  • The National Policy on Climate Change of Uruguay (2017).
  • UN (12 December 2015), The Paris Agreement.
  • UN General Assembly (2020), Human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment, A/75/161.
  • UN General Assembly (2021), The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: guidance on ensuring respect for human rights defenders, A/HRC/47/39/Add.2.
  • UN General Assembly (29 July 2016), Rights of indigenous peoples, A/71/229.
  • UN General Assembly (30 December 2019), Right to a healthy environment: good practices, A/HRC/43/53, Annex II.
  • UN General Assembly (8 January 2019), Issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment, A/HRC/40/55.
  • UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA (October 3, 2009), Act 32/2009 regarding Environmental Protection and Management, Business News 7933-7934/3-24-2010.
  • UNHR (2020), Right to a healthy environment: good practices, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment.
  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2008), Guidance on Implementation of the Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers, ECE/MP.PP/7.
  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2019), ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS, KAZAKHSTAN, Third Review, Synopsis.
  • United Nations Environment Programme (2019 Report), The Production Gap, the discrepancy between countries’ planned fossil fuel production and global production levels consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C or 2°C.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2011), The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020, Final Report – Rev. A, Office of Air and Radiation.
  • Gauderman, W. James; Urman, obert; Avol, Edward; Berhane, Kiros; McConnell, Rob; Rappaport, Edward; Chang, Roger; Lurmann, Fred; Gilliland, Frank (2015), Association of improved air quality with lung development in children, The new england journal of medicine, Vol. 372, No. 10.
  • Watson, James E. M.; Dudley, Nigel; Segan, Daniel B.; Hockings, Marc (6 NOVEMBER 2014), The performance and potential of protected areas, NATURE, Vol. 515.
  • WHO Regional Office for Europe (2015), Human biomonitoring: facts and figures, World Health Organization.
  • World Future Council (2019), Outstanding Practices in Agroecology 2019 Announced, https://www.worldfuturecouncil.org/press-release-opa-2019/, Accessed on 2022/05/24.
مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
دوره 17، شماره 39
تیر 1404
صفحه 251-282

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار