Document Type : Original Article

Author

Tehran University-farabi

Abstract

Although the reflection of Dar´ rule in the Book One (Generalities) of Islamic Penal Code 2013 under the articles 120 and 121 indicates that the rule also applies to retaliation (qisas), apparently many articles of the Book Four (retaliation) of Islamic Penal Code 2013 evoke the meaning that Dar´ rule is not applicable to retaliation. Three possibilities are imaginable when the articles 120, 121, and the afore-mentioned articles get together: the application of Dar´ rule to retaliation except the afore-mentioned articles; the application of Dar´ rule to retaliation in general and the domination of the articles 120 and 121 over afore-mentioned articles; non-application of Dar´ rule to retaliation in general. Reviewing three possibilities and presupposing that first, Dar´ rule has exclusive function only in the case that the evidences and the positive principles are punishments, and second, it is only meaningful when the judge casts doubt on instances, the article supports the application of Dar´ rule to retaliation and generally to the human rights whether they are hudud (crimes fixed and severe punishments in Islamic sources), qisas (retaliation), diyat (monetary compensation for deaths and bodily injuries), and ta´zirat (discretionary punishments estimated by a judge).

Keywords

- Bojnourdi (Mousavi), Seyed Mohammad (1993); Rules of jurisprudence; , Tehran: Miad.
- Fazel Lankarani, Mohammad (1996);Jameol Almasael.
- Haji Dehabadi, Ahmad (2019), Crimes against persons, , Tehran: Mizan.- Haji Dehabadi, Ahmad (2020); Rules of Criminal Jurisprudence, Qom: Seminary and University Research Institute
- Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar (1993), Legal Terminology,  Tehran: Ganj-e-Danesh.

- Mo'men Qomi, Mohammad (2001),Mabani Tahrir Alvacile, Al-Hudood,  Tehran: Institute for organizing and publishing the works of Imam Khomeini.

- Sadeghi, Mohammad Hadi (2015). Crimes against persons,  Tehran, amount.
- Tabrizi, Mirza Javad(1999); New referendums;  Qom: Server Publications.
-Alavi, Adel (1999); Al-Qisas (lectures by Ayatollah Marashi Najafi); vol, Qom: Library of Grand Ayatollah Marashi Najafi.
-Ameli (Shahid Thani), Zayn al-Din ibn Ali (1992);Masalek Alefham ; vol 15,  Qom: Islamic Enlightenment Foundation.
-Ameli, Muhammad ibn Hassan Harr (1995);  Vasael Asheeh; vol 28, Qom: Al-Bayt Foundation.
-Fazel Lankarani, Mohammad (2000); Tafsilosharieh (Qisas); Ch 1, Qom: Jurisprudential Center of the Imams
-Haji Dehabadi, Ahmad (2021); Textbook of Rules of Criminal Jurisprudence, Qom: Seminary and University Research Institute.
-Hazm, Ali ibn Ahmad (unpublished), Al-Mohalla, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
-Heli, Hassan Ibn Yusuf Ibn Motahar (1992), Qawa'd al-Ahkam, vol. 2, Qom: Islamic Publications Office-Heli, Ja'far ibn Hassan (1987), Sharia al-Islam, vol. 4,  Qom: Ismaili Institute.
-Judicial Educational and Research Institute (2011), Treasury of Judicial Referendums, Qom.
-Karimi Jahromi, Ali (1991); Addorol Manzod  (Lectures of Ayatollah Golpayegani);Darol Qoran Alkarim
-Khansari, Sayyid Ahmad (1984); Comprehensive evidence; vol7, Qom: Ismailis.-Khoei, Sayyid Abu al-Qasim (2001),Mabani Takmele Almenhaj. vol 41&42 (Encyclopedia of Imam al-Khoei), vols.-Khoei, Sayyid Abu al-Qasim (2003),Mohazerat dar Mavaris, Qom: International Sect Institute. -Khomeini, Seyyed Ruhollah (unpublished); Tahrir al-Waseela; vol 2, Qom: Dar Al-Alam Press Institute.
-Najafi (Saheb Javaher), Mohammad Hassan (1984), Javaher al-Kalam Fi Sharh al-Sh'aria al-Islam,Vol. 41, Beirut: Dar al-Ehya al-Toras al-Arab
-Rahiminejad, Ismail (1396), Conflict between the principle of istihaab and the rule of law in the Islamic Penal Code, Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Year 50, No. 1, Spring and Summer 2017, pp. 77-86.-Sabzwari, Sayyid Abdul Ali (1996) Mohazzab Alahkam;vol 27, Office of the Grand Ayatollah Sabzevari.

 -Sadati ,Seyed Mohamad Mahdi ,(2016), “Conditions Applying to âdareâ Rule in Emamiye Jurisprudence and Islamic Penal Code, Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence, Issue.11, pp.113-146.

-Sadati, Seyyed Mohammad Mehdi (2016), Conditions for applying the rule in Imami jurisprudence and the Islamic Penal Code, Studies of Islamic jurisprudence and law, Year 8, No. 14, Spring and Summer 2016, pp. 113-146.-Tabatabai, Sayyid Ali (2001), Riyadh Al-Masa'il, vol. 13,  Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.-Zanjani, Seyyed Musa Shobiri (1998), The Book of Marriage, , Qom: Rai Pardaz Research Institute.
- Rahiminejad, Esmaeil (2017), “The Conflict between the Principle of Istiṣḥāb and Darʼ Rule in Iranian Islamic Penal Code”, Jurisprudence & the Fundamens of Islamic Law, Issue.1 , pp.77-86.
- Mortazi ,Ahmad; Amiran Bakhshayesh ,Amir ,(2019), “The effect of removing of condemnation and decriminalize of Dar rule in the crimes punishable by Qisas with the approach of to the Penal Code in 1392, Journal of Criminal Law Research, Issue.25, pp.59-87
-Reza Ilhami Sayyed Sajjad Mohammadi Kamal Aqapour,(2018),  Conflict of istiṣḥāb and dar` rule in criminal jurisprudence and IslamicPun-ishment Code 2014 Feqh A Quarterly Scientific-Research Journal Vol. 25, No. 95, Autumn 2018 pp 108-132