A Reflection on Administrative Court Organization Models in the Judicial System

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of International Law, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22075/feqh.2022.28180.3354

Abstract

The significance and distinctiveness of administrative litigation, compared to other forms of litigation, stem not only from the specialized nature of administrative disputes but also from their political dimensions. According to some scholars, the Administrative Justice Court in Iran was modeled after the French administrative litigation system. However, significant differences exist between the administrative litigation structures in Iran and France. The central question of this article is to what extent the reasons for establishing an independent structure separate from general courts for handling administrative disputes exist in Iran. Is the creation of such an independent structure necessary to address the specific requirements of administrative disputes? This study examines the structural models of administrative litigation in selected European countries (notably France, the UK, and Germany), American systems (specifically the United States), and Islamic nations based on population size (including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, Algeria, Pakistan, and Yemen). Finally, it focuses on Iran’s legal framework to answer the aforementioned questions. The findings suggest that the creation of an independent structure for administrative litigation is primarily driven by political rather than rational considerations. It appears that the political factors necessitating an independent structure for administrative litigation are not significantly present in Iran. Thus, the resolution of administrative disputes within a unified judicial framework, based on the German administrative litigation model, is feasible.

Keywords


  •  - Ahangari, Ehsan; Jahandost Dalanjan, Masoud (2011), Independence of the Judicial Structure as a Basic Tool in Realizing Judicial Security in the Islamic Judicial Model, Studies in Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, 25, 99-128.

    - Ajarloo, Esmaeil (2016), Fundamental Laws of Islamic Countries, Tehran: Guardian Council Research Institute.

     - Bahrami-Khoshkar, Mohammad; Abbas Asgari (1400), Jurisprudential Review of Electronic Proceedings and Its Pathology, Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Studies, 25, 129-152.

     - Balaghi, Seyyed Sadr al-Din (2019), Justice and Judgment in Islam, Vol. 3, Tehran: Amir Kabir.

    - Elliott, Catherine; Catherine Vernon (2008), The French Legal System, Translated by Safar Beigzadeh, Tehran: Samt.

    - Emami, Mohammad; Mahasti Soleimani (2013), Criteria for Determining Claims That Can Be Filed in the Administrative Court of Justice, Justice Legal Journal, 82, 9-38.

    - European Commission for the Promotion of Justice (CEPEJ) (2016), Evaluation of European Judicial Systems in 2012, Tehran: Judiciary Press and Publications Center.

    - Farkman, Anke; Thomas Wegrisch (2009), Justice in Germany, Vol. 2, Translated by: Mohammad Saderi Tohidkhaneh and Hamid Bahremand Beg-Nazar, Tehran: Samt.

    - General Department of Cultural Affairs and Public Relations of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (2015), Detailed Report of the Discussions of the Assembly for the Final Review of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Vol. 3.

     - Hemmati, Mojtaba (2016), The Right of Access to Justice in the Administrative Court of Justice with a Look at the Opinions of the Guardian Council, Danesh Public Law Quarterly, 16, 103-128.

    - Madax, Robert (2006), Constitutional Laws of the World, Translated by Seyyed Meqdad Torabi, Tehran: Shahr Danesh. - Mirdamad Najafabadi, Seyyed Ali (2011), A Glance at the Laws of Administrative Procedure in Iran and the Course of Administrative Developments, Thoughts of Public Law, 2, 69-88.

     - Mahmoudi, Javad (2014), Analytical Study of Administrative Procedure in Iranian Law, Vol. 2, Tehran: Jangal.

     - Nejabet Khah, Morteza (2011), The Law of the Administrative Court of Justice in the Current Legal System, Tehran: Jangal.

    - Rezaizadeh, Mohammad Javad (1384), French Administrative Courts and Their Competence in Handling Administrative Claims, Tehran: Management.

     - Rostami, Vali; Khosravi, Ahmad (1392), Feasibility Study of the Code of Administrative Procedure, Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Perspectives, 64, 81-102.

    - Sadr-e-Hifazai, Seyyed Nasrallah (1372), Judicial Supervision of Government Actions in the Administrative Court of Justice, Tehran: Shahriar.

    - Saket, Mohammad Hossein (1382), Proceedings in Islamic Law, Tehran: Mizan.

     - Tabatabaei Motamani, Manouchehr (2008), Administrative Law, Vol. 15, Tehran: Samt.

    - Tabatabaei Motamani, Manouchehr (2012), Comparative Administrative Law (Rule of Law and Comparative Administrative Procedure in Several Large Countries), Vol. 5, Tehran: Samt.

     - Zarang, Mohammad (1381), The Evolution of the Iranian Judicial System, Vol. 2, Tehran: Islamic Revolution Documents Center.

    7- Fathi, Younes; Shafiei Sardasht, Jafar; Maryam Vahibi Fakhr (2019), The Ideal System of Administrative Procedure in Iran, Quarterly Journal of New Administrative Law Studies, 1, 73-94.

    • Administrative Justice in Europe- Report for Ireland (2/2/2019), Available online at: http://www.aca-europe.eu/en/eurtour/i/countries/ireland/ireland_en.pdf
    • Hriptievschi, Nadejda, et al (2014), Specialisation of Judges and Feasibility of Creating Administrative Courts in the Republic of Moldova, LRCM.
    • Terekhova, Lyda (2014), Grounds for the Specialization of Courts and Judges in Russia, Russian Law Journal, Volume II Issue 4, 176-186.
    • The Swedish Judicial System (2015), Produced by the Ministry of Justice,
    • Winkler, Roland, Administrative Justice in Europe:The EU Acquis, good practice and recent developments (2007), University of Salzburg.
    • Woehrling, Jean-Marie (2006), Judicial Control of Administrative Authorities in Europe: Toward A Common Model, Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine, France.
    • Zimmer, Markus B. (2009), Overview of Specialized Courts, International Journal for Court Administration, 1-15.