The relativity of the abstract feature of negotiable instruments with an emphasis on judicial procedure

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch, South of Iran

3 Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Damavand Branch, Iran

Abstract

The separation of negotiable instruments from the civil obligation is the separation between two legal relationships, which is called abstract presumption. The most important aspects of this presumption: indebtedness and lack of attention to flaws in the private relations of the parties, which is called relative presumption. Although the commercial law of Iran has not explicitly accepted the fact that negotiable instruments are abstract, it can be inferred from the spirit of some laws, but some side examples cannot be considered absolute in the absence of the ability to invoke flaws against a third party, because exceptionally, it is assumed by the legislator to protect the third party. In order to achieve a logical attitude, the relativity of the abstract presumption should be examined according to the concept of the presumption and the principle of uncertainty of the presumptions and their opposability from the perspective of jurists, law, and judicial procedure. The judicial procedure has accepted this relativity, unlike some harsh attitudes in the field of turning civil obligation into commercial obligation.

Keywords


- Ekhli, Behrouz (1375), Business Law 3, Master's course, Faculty of Law, University of Tehran.
- General Legal Department of the Judiciary (12/11/2013), implementation of the principle of disregarding objections, Theory No. 7/3750-30/07/2013, year 68, No. 19783.
- Skini, Rabia (1389), Trade Laws (Promissory Note, Promissory Note and Cheque), Volume 2, Chapter 14, Tehran: Smit.
- Eslami, Reza (1381), Commentary on the first cycle of lessons in philosophy of philosophy, vol. 1, ch. 2, Qom: Bostan Kitab.
- Allahabadi, Kamal (1377), the principle of independence of signatures and ignoring defects in commercial documents, judicial legal perspectives, 10-11, 7-26.
- Emami, Seyyed Hassan (B.T.A.), Civil Rights, vol.6, Tehran: Islamia.
- Bazgir, Yadullah (1379), Civil Law according to the opinions of the Supreme Court, Tehran: Ferdowsi.
- Bahrami, Bahram (2007), Applied Business Law, Vol. 3, Tehran: Negh Bineh.
- Judiciary Research Institute (2016a), collection of judicial opinions of the branches of the Supreme Court of the country, 2013, Ch2, Tehran: Deputy of Social Affairs and Crime Prevention of the Judiciary.
- Judiciary Research Institute (2016b), the collection of judicial opinions of the Courts of Appeals of Tehran Province in 2015, Q2, Tehran: Deputy of Social Affairs and Crime Prevention of the Judiciary.
- Judiciary Research Center (2016c), collection of judicial opinions of Tehran Province Courts of Appeal in 2014, Q2, Tehran: Deputy of Social Affairs and Crime Prevention of the Judiciary.
- Judiciary Research Center (1396d), collection of judicial opinions of Supreme Court branches 1393, Tehran: Deputy of Social Affairs and Crime Prevention of the Judiciary.
- Judiciary Research Institute, (1400), the implication of Article 265 of the Civil Code on the authority of religion in the light of judicial procedure, Ch3, Tehran: Deputy of Social Affairs and Crime Prevention of the Judiciary.
- Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jaafar (1381), General Introduction to the Science of Law, Chapter 3, Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library.
- Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jaafar (2015), Legal Terminology, Ch 30, Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library.
- A collection of judges (1374), excerpts of opinions of legal courts, Ch. 1, Tehran: Mizan.
- Junadi, Laiya; Shariati Nesab, Sadegh (2012), Abstract description in Iranian law with an emphasis on judicial procedure, Private Law Studies, 43, 17-29.
  - Habibi, Mahmoud (2016), representation in commercial documents, Vol. 1, Tehran: Mizan.
- Delshad, Ibrahim; Ahmadzadeh, Faezeh (2015), Rules of keeping promises in paying commercial documents, Tehran: Majd.
- Demarchili, Mohammad; Hatami, Ali; Qaraei, Mohsen (1390), Trade Law in the Current Legal System, Ch. 11, Tehran: Dodestan.
- Sotoudeh Tehrani, Hassan (1389), Business Law, Volume 3, Chapter 16, Tehran: Judge.
- Sharifi, Alireza (2015), principles and rules governing commercial documents, Tehran: Justice.
- Sabaghian, Hossein (2016), Characteristics and benefits of commercial documents according to the opinions of the Supreme Court, Tehran: Jangal.
- Safari, Mohammad (2007), "Esnad" Commercial Laws, Tehran: Publishing Company.
- Katouzian, Nasser (1376), civil rights (property and ownership), Tehran: Dadgstar.
- Katouzian, Nasser (2003b), Validity of the Judged Matter, Tehran: Mizan.
- Katouzian, Nasser (2007), Introduction to the science of law and study in Iran's legal system, Ch. 66, Tehran: Publishing Company.
- Katouzian, Nasser (1400), proof and reason of proof, vol.2, ch.10, Tehran: Mizan.
- Katouzian, Nasser (2013), The Nature and Effect of Legal Emirate, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, 64, 125-154.
- Katouzian, Nasser (2004), General Rules of Contracts, Vol.4, Ch.4, Tehran: Publishing Company.
- Karkhiran, Mohammad Hossein (2012), Civil Rights of Iran, Volume 1, Tehran: Ariyadad.
- Kamiyar, Gholamreza (2016), Collection of Mahshai Laws of Check Issuance, Tehran: Majd.
- Kaviani, Korosh (2013), Commercial Document Law, Tehran: Mizan.
- Grami Tayibi, Omid (2018), Advanced Description of Commercial Law, Qochan: Andishe Arshad.
- Maqsoodi, Murad (2016), Judicial Procedure and Legal Thoughts (Legal Matters), Tehran: Prohan.
- Manaqib, Zahra Sadat; Manaqib, Seyyed Mustafa (1400), validation of legal and judicial authority in criminal proceedings, Studies of Fiqh and Islamic Law, 25, 443-472.
- Nik Farjam, Kamal (1383), Transaction of commercial documents and conversion of obligation, Judicial Law Perspectives, 32-33, 115-136.