Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 PhD student of Criminal Law and Dogmatology, North Branch of Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Criminal Law and Dogmatology, North Branch of Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Judicial oversight is one of the most important issues in criminal procedure that has always been the subject of discussion and opinion. This article tries to make a comparative study of judicial supervision in Iranian and French law. The present article is a descriptive-analytical study and examines the question using the library method. The results indicate that in the French criminal justice system, the only alternative to temporary detention is judicial supervision as a criminal security that includes and supplies all the assets of this system and adopts a unified approach and the need to pay attention to the needs of investigation and action. Tamin seeks to create the conditions for maximum balance between security and freedom. In the Iranian criminal procedure, however, despite the provision of judicial supervision as an alternative to temporary detention and some subscriptions with French law, due to the dual approach adopted by the legislature, the main, single and independent function of this criminal institution is subordinate, dual and complementary. Has become. Considering the recourse and using examples such as deterrence and obstruction and having a supervisory aspect, it may be said that in case of recourse to the judicial authority along with other appointments to any of the foreseen cases, judicial supervision is in order to prevent and correct the accused and guarantee The more the victim's salary, the more security will be taken from the accused, which violates the purpose of judicial supervision and is in opposition to criminal justice and the establishment of its goals, and not only loses its main mission, but also the efficiency of this institution. It has a negative effect. The need to pay attention to a unified approach to security and oversight appointments in Iranian law, such as French law, provides the maximum context for the investigating authority to accurately take steps to fully protect the rights of victims of crime and provide the most appropriate security in conflict with Individual liberties are not desirable in the view of progressive criminal justice systems.
Keywords
- Estefani, Gaston, Georgelvassor and Bernard Bolk (1377), Criminal Procedure Code (Criminal Procedure Flow), translated by Hasan Dadban, Vol. 2, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Publications.
- Ashuri, Mohammad (2014), Criminal Procedure Code, Volume 2, Chapter 8, Tehran: Semit.
- Ashouri, Mohammad (2012), The transformation of the prosecutor's office and the prosecution case, in criminal justice (2) (collection of articles), Tehran: Dadgstar.
- Bourican, Jacques; Anne-Marie Simon, (2008), Criminal Procedure, translated by: Abbas Tedin, Tehran: Khorsandi.
- Pourrajb Kazi Mahalle, Fatemeh (2013), "Temporary detention in the criminal law of Iran and England", Rah Vakalat Quarterly, 5 and 6, 169-185.
- Tedin, Abbas (2012), translation of the French Criminal Procedure Code, Tehran: Khorsandi.
- Tedin, Abbas (2012), judicial supervision in the criminal proceedings of Iran and France, encyclopedia of criminal sciences (collection of new articles on criminal sciences), book 2, Tehran: Mizan.
- Jovanmard, Behrouz (2009), Judicial Process in Iranian Criminal Law, Tehran: Behnami.
- Khaleghi, Ali (2013), Criminal Procedure Code, Chapter 4, Tehran: Shahr Danesh Institute of Legal Studies and Research.
- Sharifi, Mohsen (1380), "In-depth analysis of the mechanisms guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of the accused in Iranian law with attention to human rights declarations", Judiciary Legal Journal, 35, 77-95.
- Tahmasabi, Javad (2016), Principles of Criminal Procedure, Tehran: Mizan.
- Fadavi Bandeh Qaraei, Ahmed; Taghizadeh, Ibrahim (2017), "Freedom and its position in the human rights thought of Imam Khomeini (RA)", Islamic Human Rights Studies Quarterly, first period, 1, 33-54.
- Largier, Jean (1378), French criminal procedure, translated by Hasan Kashfi Ismailzadeh, Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library.
- Deputy for Education and Research of the Judiciary (2012), the collection of judicial meetings on criminal procedure issues, Volume 1, Volume 2, Tehran: Javadane.
- Mossadegh, Mohammad (2019), final decisions, criminal security and judicial supervision, Ch3, Tehran: Jangal.
- Elahi Menesh, Mohammadreza (2010), Temporary detention and its alternatives in Iranian and French law, Tehran: Majd.
-
-Dyvrande B.( 2006), «La détention provisoire : mise en perspective et lacunes des sources statistiques Bruno Aubusson de Cavarlay, Questions pénales, Cesdip, juin.
-Maestracci, Nicole, (2006), présidente du tribunal de grande instance de Melun, audition CNCDH; 16 mai.
-Snacken, (2006), sonja professeur de criminologie à l’ULB (Bruxelles), présidente du Conseil de coopération pénologique du Conseil de l’Europe, audition CNCDH, 30 mai.
)