The study of jurisprudential foundations of the formation of government in Islamic religions emphasizing the role of reason

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor of Islamic Jurisprudence and Foundations of Islamic Law, University of Tehran (Farabi Campus), Qom, Iran (Corresponding Author)

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, University of Tehran (Farabi Campus), Qom, Iran.

3 Ph.D. Graduate in Public Law, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

Due to the arrival of religion in various aspects of human life, the full implementation of the laws and regulations of religion and the achievement of its goals is not possible except by establishing a religion based on religion.
In this article, we will analyze the jurisprudential foundations of the formation of government in various Islamic religions from the point of view of reason. What is considered as wisdom is the jurisprudential foundations of the approximation of Islamic religions and the word of Allah (as the complete intellect) in the Holy Qur'an.
Sunni school principles of the Quartet of (a salt solution and marriage, succession by Caliph now, angry and overcome salinity by Khalifa ex to select a new ruler) to select the ruling highlighted, the principles discussed above, allegiance is completed Among the three trends of contemporary political thought, Shiite jurisprudence identified two patterns (the jurisprudential theory and the theory of the lawyers of individual personal owners) for choosing a ruler.
The need for the approximation of Islamic religions is a reaction to obstacles that are in conflict with the institution of reason. The acceptance of the rule based on "victory and conquest" and "the choice of successor by the present caliph" in Islamic societies is a kind of direct struggle with the institution of reason.

Keywords

References

  • al-Quran al-Karim (The Holy Qur’an).
  • al-Amidi, Saif al-Din Ali ibn Muhammad al-Shafi‘i. (1982). Al-Ahkam fi Usul al-Ahkam. Beirut: Al-Maktab al-Islami.
  • al-Dawalibi, Muhammad Ma'ruf. (1965). Al-Madkhal ila ‘Ilm al-Usul. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Jadid.
  • al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid. (1992). Al-Mustasfa min ‘Ilm al-Usul, Vol. 2, Edited by Hamza bin Zuhayr Hafiz. Madinah: Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah Printing Co.
  • al-Jurjani, Mir Sharif. (1907). Sharh al-Mawaqif, Edited by Badr al-Din Na’sani. Qom: Sharif Razi.
  • al-Mawardi, Ali ibn Muhammad. (1986). Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah. Qom: Islamic Information Office.
  • al-Shawkani, Muhammad ibn Ali. (1999). Irshad al-Fuhul ila Tahqiq al-Haqq min ‘Ilm al-Usul, Edited by Ahmad Azzu ‘Inayah. Damascus: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi.
  • al-Sanhuri, Abd al-Razzaq Ahmad. (2008). Fiqh al-Khilafah wa Tatawwuruha li-Tusbih ‘Usbat Umam Sharqiyyah. Beirut: Al-Halabi Legal Publications.
  • al-Tabari, Muhammad ibn Jarir. (1939). Tarikh al-Tabari. Cairo: Matba‘at al-Istiqlamah.
  • Abu Ya‘la, Muhammad Husayn ibn al-Farra’. (1986). Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah. Qom: Daftar Tablighat-e Islami.
  • Awwani, Gholamreza; Davari, Reza; Malekian, Mostafa; Legenhausen, Muhammad. (1995). “Iqtrah: A Rational Defense of Religion.” Naqd va Nazar Journal, 2, 9–44.
  • Ebne Qudamah Hanbali, Muwaffaq al-Din. (1972). Al-Mughni, Vol. 10. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah.
  • Fallahi, Seyed Adnan; Masjedsara’i, Hamid. (2020). “A Reassessment of Abu Hanifa’s View on Hadith.” Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Studies, 23, 233–258.
  • Fazlollah, Sayyed Mohammad Hossein. (1998). Freedom and Democracy, trans. Majid Moradi. Political Science Quarterly, 3, 108–132.
  • Foad Abd al-Jawad, Ahmad. (1998). Al-Bay‘ah among Sunni Thinkers and the Social Contract in Modern Political Thought. Cairo: Dar al-Qibaa.
  • Haeri Yazdi, Mehdi. (1995). Hikmat wa Hukumat (Philosophy and Government). London: Shadi Publications.
  • Imam Khomeini, Sayyed Ruhollah. (1995). Sahifeh-ye Noor, Vol. 9. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance.
  • Imam Khomeini, Sayyed Ruhollah. (2000). Kitab al-Bay‘, Vol. 2. Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works.
  • Imam Khomeini, Sayyed Ruhollah. (2012). Wilayat al-Faqih: Islamic Government, Vol. 28. Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works.
  • Jannati, Mohammad Ebrahim. (1996). Sources of Ijtihad from the Perspective of Islamic Schools. Tehran: Keyhan.
  • Kadivar, Mohsen. (1997). Theories of Government in Shi‘a Jurisprudence. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney.
  • Kadivar, Mohsen. (2001). Theories of Government in Shi‘a Jurisprudence. Tehran: Ney.
  • Kadivar, Mohsen. (2000). Concerns of a Religious Government. Tehran: Ney.
  • Mofid, Mohammad Reza al-Muzaffar. (1996). Usul al-Fiqh, Vol. 2. Qom: Esma‘iliyan.
  • Montazeri Najafabadi, Hussein Ali. (1988). Dirasat fi Wilayat al-Faqih wa Fiqh al-Dawlah al-Islamiyyah, Vol. 1, trans. Mahmoud Salavati. Tehran: Keyhan.
  • Nahj al-Balaghah.
  • Rezaei, Abdolreza. (2020). “Legitimacy Assessment of the Condition of Gratuitous Agency in Civil Partnership Contracts.” Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Studies, 23, 97–122.
  • Salehi Najafabadi, Ne‘matollah. (1984). Wilayat al-Faqih: Government of the Righteous. Qom: Rasa Cultural Institute.
  • Seyyed Kazem Qazi Zadeh. (2005). Politics and Government in the Qur’an. Tehran: Research Institute for Culture and Islamic Thought.
  • Taftazani, Sa‘d al-Din. (1887). Sharh al-Maqasid. Matba‘at al-Hajj Muharram Effendi.
  • Zarqa, Mustafa Ahmad. (2004). Al-Madkhal al-Fiqhi al-‘Amm. Beirut: Dar al-Shamiyyah.
  • Zohreh Firoozi, Davood Feyrahi. (1998). “Foundations of Freedom and Party in Shi‘a Doctrine.” Political Science Quarterly, 3, 133–149.
Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence
Volume 17, Issue 39
June 2025
Pages 63-90

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics