Sometimes, we consider some certain criterions of the superiority in the jurisprudence that discord apparently with human and moral principles. In this paper, firstly, we reconnoiter these criterions, then, because of uncertainty about existence of such sentences in sharia, we investigate the measure of their stability by study juridical and research in the books of jurists. In the meantime, we confront waveringly in the existence of the some sentences in Sharia but it is proved the existence some other. Because of that, in the second level, we will explain the reason of such sentences. The method of this research is analytical and style Library.
(2016). A Study about surpassing criterions in the jurisprudence. Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence, 8(15), 37-62. doi: 10.22075/feqh.2017.1957
MLA
. "A Study about surpassing criterions in the jurisprudence", Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence, 8, 15, 2016, 37-62. doi: 10.22075/feqh.2017.1957
HARVARD
(2016). 'A Study about surpassing criterions in the jurisprudence', Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence, 8(15), pp. 37-62. doi: 10.22075/feqh.2017.1957
VANCOUVER
A Study about surpassing criterions in the jurisprudence. Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence, 2016; 8(15): 37-62. doi: 10.22075/feqh.2017.1957
)