Examining the jurisprudential and legal foundations of the permissibility and impermissibility of absentee proceedings

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Jurisprudence and Foundations of Islamic Law, Mehdishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran (Corresponding Author)

2 PhD Graduate of Jurisprudence and Foundations of Islamic Law, Yadegar-e-Imam (RA) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Master of Criminal Law and Criminology, Mehdishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.

4 Master of Law

10.22075/feqh.2026.31263.3655

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of absentee proceedings in the works of Shia jurisprudence and subject law. Although in the season of hostility, the principle is that the parties to the dispute must attend the hearing, sometimes the unconditional adherence to this principle leads to the violation of the rights of individuals. Because it is possible that one of the parties to the dispute may hide his case from the access of the other party and the justice authorities, causing insecurity, uncertainty and dissatisfaction with the judicial system. Considering this, in Islam, intercession is accepted with the aim of creating security and preventing the violation of people's rights. According to this, in Islam, intercession is accepted with the aim of creating security and preventing the violation of people's rights. The jurists have also cited traditions and hadiths in order to prove the legality of the issue of divorce (proceeding in absentia) and have set conditions for it. Imamiyyah jurists consider issuing a judgment in absentia in matters that depend on personal rights and human rights as right and legitimate, and in divine rights and punishments, a judgment in absentia cannot be issued without the presence of the accused. Because the right of people is based on caution and the right of God is based on mitigation. Therefore, there is no limit to the right of God and punishments.

Keywords


-Al-Qur'an Al-Karim (The Holy Quran).
-A. Ashtiani, Mirza Mohammad Hassan (2004). Kitab al-Qada’. Qom: Zuhair.
-Al-Amili (Al-Shahid Al-Awwal), Muhammad ibn Makki (1996). Al-Duroos al-Shar'iyyah fi Fiqh al-Imamiyyah, Vol. 2. Qom: Al-Nashr al-Islami.
-Al-Bharani Al-Larimi, Mohammad; Gholipour Darfshan, Seyyed Mohammad Taghi (2010). Osul-e Etebar-e 'Ahd Namah Hay-e Shakhsi Dar Hoquq-e Iran va Hoquq-e Islam (Theory of Validity of Personal Pacts in Iranian Law and Islamic Law). Majaleh Motale'at-e Fiqh va Hoquq-e Islami, 23-51.
- Al-Birjandi, Seyyed Ali Akbar (2013). Hosein Ibn Ali and Ashura. Qom: Boustan-e Ketab.
- Al-Hallah (Al-Allamah), Hassan ibn Yusuf (1992). Qawa'id al-Ahkam fi Ma'rifat al-Halal wa al-Haram, Vol. 3. Qom: Al-Nashr al-Islami.
- Al-Hallah (Al-Allamah), Hassan ibn Yusuf (1999). Tahriir al-Ahkaam al-Shar'iyyah. Qom: Imam Sadeq (AS) Institute.
- Al-Hurr Al-'Amili, Muhammad ibn Hassan (1991). Tafsil Wasa'il al-Shi'ah ila Tahsil Mas'ail al-Shari'ah, Vol. 18. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi.
- Al-Khaleqi, Ali (2009). Ayin Dadresi Keyfari (Criminal Procedure Code), 2nd ed. Tehran: Shahr-e Danesh.
- Al-Khu'i, Abu al-Qasim (1989). Minhaj al-Salihin. Qom: Dar al-Zahra'.
- Al-Khu'i, Seyyed Abu al-Qasim (1989). Mabani Takmilat al-Minhaj, Vol. 1. Qom: Madinat al-'Ilm.K.
-Al-Muhaddith Al-Sabzevari, Muhammad Baqir (2002). Kifayat al-Ahkam, Vol. 2. Qom: Al-Nashr al-Islami.
- Al-Muhaqqiq Damad, Seyyed Mustafa (2007). Qawa'id Fiqh (Legal Maxims). Tehran: Markaz-e Nashr-e 'Ulum-e Islami.
- Al-Najafi (Sahib Jawahir), Muhammad Hassan (2011). Jawahir al-Kalam fi Sharh Shara'i' al-Islam, Vol. 40. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi.N.
- Al-Shirazi, Seyyed Mohammad (1988). Al-Fiqh, Vol. 84. Qom: Dar al-'Ilm.
-Al-Tusi Ibn Hamzah, Muhammad ibn Ali (1987). Al-Wasilah ila Nail al-Fadhilah. Qom: Ayatollah Al-Odhma Mar'ashi Najafi Library.
- Al-Yazdi, Seyyed Mohammad Kazim Al-Tabataba'i (1993). Takmilat al-'Urwah al-Wuthqa, Vol. 6. Qom: Davari Bookshop.
-Barari Larimi, Mohammad; Gholipour Darfshan, Seyyed Mohammad Taghi (2010). Hoquq-e Mottahem ba Roykard-e Fiqhi (Defendant's Rights from a Jurisprudential Perspective). Majaleh Motale'at-e Fiqh va Hoquq-e Islami, 23-51.
- Correctional Judicial Training Center (2003). Majmu'eh Nashst-haye Ghaza'i, Masael-e Ayin Dadresi Keyfari (2) (Collection of Judicial Sessions, Issues of Criminal Procedure Law (2)). Qom: Educational and Research Deputy of the Judiciary.
- Halli Ibn Sa'id, Yahya (1984). Al-Jami' li Shara'i'. Qom: Sayyid al-Shuhada' Scientific Institute.
- Khomeini (Imam), Seyyed Ruhollah (2011). Tahrir al-Wasilah, Vol. 2. Qom: Qods Mohammadi.
- Malmir, Mahmoud (2004). Aray-e Ghiyabi va Vakhvaahī az An (Ex Parte Judgments and Appeal Thereof). Majaleh Dadrasī, 45, 19-16.
-Rezaei-Nejad, Homayoun; Rezaei-Nejad, Amirhossein (2011). Hukm-e Ghiyabi: Harkat az Mabani be Samte Roykard-e Novin (Ex Parte Judgment: Moving from Principles Towards a New Approach). Majaleh Hoquqi Dadgostari, 75, 173-197.
-Torabi, Morteza (2013). Al-Kafi fi Fiqh al-Imamiyyah. Qom: Boustan-e Ketab.
-Tavakkoli, Saeed (2004). Vakhvahee dar Da'avi Medani va Keifari (Appeal in Civil and Criminal Cases). Majaleh Dadrasī, 43, 83-85.
- Zera'at, Abbas; Mohajeri, Ali (2007). Ayin Dadresi Keyfari (Criminal Procedure Code), 3rd ed. Tehran: Fikr-Sazan.