Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence

Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence

"Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedience

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mohammad hosein Roohi yazdi 1
Mohammadreza Ayati 2
Aliasghar Arabian 3
1 PhD student of Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor of Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 دانشیار گروه حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
10.22075/feqh.2021.24763.3050
Abstract
When there is doubt in the obligation and there is no reason, it is the time to implement the practical principle. What is the verdict of basic rule in case of doubt in the obligation? There is disagreement among uṣūliyūn (legal theorists). The famous uṣūliyūn (legal theorists) believe in the implementation of the innocence by virtue of reason and by citation of the rule of obscenity for unstated punishment. Contrary to the popular opinion some people, by rejecting the popular view, considered the rule of reason as a necessity of caution. Martyr Sadr (RA) called this theory the right of obedience and he believes that as long as the release is not from the legislator, whoever opposes the suspicious duty, deserves the punishment.
From these two professions, we have accepted the theory of obedience. But in accepting this theory, we have a nominal understanding and a fundamental disagreement with Martyr Sadr. Because Martyr Sadr considered the issue of the right of obedience as an obligatory task, but we considered the issue of the right of obedience as a duty in the real world according to the practical rational rule.
While reviewing criticizing and rejecting the two mentional professions, we have explained and presented arguments and defended our point of view and we have named it finalized of duty or new method. I invite you to read this article to get more accustomed with the new method.
Keywords
Practical principle
innocence
precaution
obscenity for unstated punishment
right of obedience
fulfillment of duty

  1. Asra 15,32,34

    1. Arahman 10
    2. Baghare 35,29
    3. Tobe 28
    4. Nesa 43
    5. Akhounde Khorasani, Mohammad Kazem, 1409 gh. , Kefayat al Osoul , Entesharat Elmiye Eslamiye.
    6. Ansari Sheikh Morteza ( 1995) Faraedolosul (two Vol) fifth print, Qom_ Iran   Islamic publishment Institute
    7. Taghavi Eshtehardi  Hosein  (2006) Emam Khomeini,s Statemen,ts lesson of Rules(Rahmatullah Aiayh) 278\3.
    8. Johari Esmaeel (1983) Asohah Vol.6  page 2319
    9. Haeri Seyed Ali Akbar(1995) Study theory of Right of Obedience(article) Islamic thought,

    Journal_ second year number 12.

    1. Khoee Seyed Abolghasem (2007) Ajvadotaghrirat Ghom_Iran Mostafavi,s edition
    2. Sobhani Sheykh Jafar (2004) article of Haghottae Bein o Rafz Valghabool (article) journal of systematic research  2,3
    3. Sadr Seyed Mohamad Bagher (2012) Dorus Fi Elmolosul _ Al Halghato Sanie  first edition Ghom_Iran
    4. Tarihi Fakhredin (1996) Majmaol Bahrein Vol. 1 page 108
    5. Sheikhe Tusi (1993) Odatol Osul   page 381
    6. Ghoravie Esfahani Sheikh Mohammad Hosein (2008)  Nahayatolderaya Fi Sharholkefaya (6 Vol. , 4  84  83) second edition Beirut_Lobnan , Ale Beit Alaihesalam  Alehyao Sarat
    7. Farahidi Khalil (1989) Al Ein Book Vol.3 page 312
    8. Koleini Mohammad (1946) Kafi Vol.7 page 214
    9. Moein Mohammad (1941) Moein dictionary Vol.1 page 1352
    10. Meshkini Eslahatol Osul (1992) page 113
    11. Mofid Sheikh Mohammad (1992) Tashihol Eteghadatol Amaniah firft edition  Ghom_Iran  Almotamerol Alami Lalfiatol Sheikhol Mofid
    12. Izadi Far,Ali Akbar; Mohseni Dehkalani, Mohammad; GhandorBijarpas, Esmaeil; “Ghalamro ghaede ghobhe eghab bela bayan dar shobahat mozoueiye” Nashriye motaleat Feqh va Hoghogh Eslami, bahar va tabestan 1396 , sal 9 , no 16 , p 87.
    13. Vahid Behbahani   Mohammad Bagher  (2002)  Alfavaedol Haeriah  third edition Ghom_Iran,

    Islamic Though College

    1. Khorasani Sheikh Hosein. Lesson meeting of Kharejol osul , Historian 24 Jamadio Sani (2014)
    2. Shahroodi Seyed Mahmood (2005) Bohus Fi Elmolosul third edition , Ghom_Iran the institute of religious jurisprudential encyclopedia
Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence
Volume 14, Issue 29
Winter 2023
Pages 7-36